After much deliberation I have finally decided that although in perfect world, a pcp would be my preferred option for consistent aiming, accuracy, quietness, multishot etc, and cost isnt a barrier, a springer will make life much simpler for me.
As ex-military, I recognise that I will have to adapt my shooting style, that the springer action cannot be effectively silenced, and I will have to reload/cock after every shot. I do like the idea of GRT because I understand it has a smoother action, easier to hold and shoot consistently, and is quieter that its spring alternative
I have looked at reviews for the BSA Lightning XL SE - GRT and the Gamo Whisper GRT as possibles but have found it difficult to make effective comparisons. Neither quoted ft lbs although I am not sure what difference 1 ft lb would make over relatively short distances. The BSA is the more expensive but I am not clear as to if that makes it a better gun. Gamo put together a package including scope and bag but I would likely want a better parallax free scope rather than the one fitted. I can afford to spend a bit because any purchase will be cheaper than a pcp package.
I would welcome the views of owners or users. Please feel free to correct any misconceptions that I may have, Finally, as I am unlikely to be hunting small game beyond 35 yards, I would interested in your views regarding preference for 177/22 at feather and fur prey.
Thank you
As ex-military, I recognise that I will have to adapt my shooting style, that the springer action cannot be effectively silenced, and I will have to reload/cock after every shot. I do like the idea of GRT because I understand it has a smoother action, easier to hold and shoot consistently, and is quieter that its spring alternative
I have looked at reviews for the BSA Lightning XL SE - GRT and the Gamo Whisper GRT as possibles but have found it difficult to make effective comparisons. Neither quoted ft lbs although I am not sure what difference 1 ft lb would make over relatively short distances. The BSA is the more expensive but I am not clear as to if that makes it a better gun. Gamo put together a package including scope and bag but I would likely want a better parallax free scope rather than the one fitted. I can afford to spend a bit because any purchase will be cheaper than a pcp package.
I would welcome the views of owners or users. Please feel free to correct any misconceptions that I may have, Finally, as I am unlikely to be hunting small game beyond 35 yards, I would interested in your views regarding preference for 177/22 at feather and fur prey.
Thank you
Greetings, Dee
Given that you've already gone through the gamut and reduced your choices to Gamo or BSA, I'll forego the usual list of preferred makes and models. I don't own a break barrel BSA, let alone a Lightning XL SE - GRT. So, I can only speak to the quality and accuracy of BSA in general - which is very good! The BSA line are famous in the Field Target and Hunter Field Target game. Let that speak for itself.
I have owned several Gamo break barrels. As you've already noted, the Gamo line is less expensive and this is a reflection of overall build quality. Inside of 35 yards they are accurate enough to do a bit of pesting. But, I wouldn't take them to any competitions.
The one caveat I'd mention regarding Gamo is that I had some trouble with their 10x Gen2 design and would recommend a Gen1 rifle instead. They have started releasing the Gen3 models and I'm waiting for the Bone Collector to become available so that I can try it.
As for your question of caliber, definitely .22 will serve you better versus "feather and fur prey".
~ Mondo
Given that you've already gone through the gamut and reduced your choices to Gamo or BSA, I'll forego the usual list of preferred makes and models. I don't own a break barrel BSA, let alone a Lightning XL SE - GRT. So, I can only speak to the quality and accuracy of BSA in general - which is very good! The BSA line are famous in the Field Target and Hunter Field Target game. Let that speak for itself.
I have owned several Gamo break barrels. As you've already noted, the Gamo line is less expensive and this is a reflection of overall build quality. Inside of 35 yards they are accurate enough to do a bit of pesting. But, I wouldn't take them to any competitions.
The one caveat I'd mention regarding Gamo is that I had some trouble with their 10x Gen2 design and would recommend a Gen1 rifle instead. They have started releasing the Gen3 models and I'm waiting for the Bone Collector to become available so that I can try it.
As for your question of caliber, definitely .22 will serve you better versus "feather and fur prey".
~ Mondo
Many thanks for your helpful reply.
I did look at other brands but Gamo and BSA sub 12 ft lbs GRT seem to be all that is available in. UK
I take on board your comment about build quality. I did have an Airsporter back in the day. My final choice is going to be Lightning XL SE GRT v Lightning SE GRT although I am not sure what the USP for either is.
Thanks again;
I did look at other brands but Gamo and BSA sub 12 ft lbs GRT seem to be all that is available in. UK
I take on board your comment about build quality. I did have an Airsporter back in the day. My final choice is going to be Lightning XL SE GRT v Lightning SE GRT although I am not sure what the USP for either is.
Thanks again;
- Page :
- 1
There are no replies made for this post yet.
Be one of the first to reply to this post!
Be one of the first to reply to this post!